Return to Home Page

September 24, 2012

Erik Cohen on how travel skews our photographic sensibilities

“Strangers entering a new environment as temporary visitors find themselves, whatever their specific motives and purposes, in an ambiguous predicament. They are typically marked by a heightened awareness and attention to life, coupled with considerable cognitive and emotional disorientation. This predicament necessarily has an impact on their motivation and conduct. It induces them to seek to capture in their photos those features of life by which they are momentarily most strongly impressed (i.e., what appear to them to be the most “authentic,” “typical,” or “exotic” subjects). However, their limited acquaintance with the environment and consequent inability to grasp anything but the most obvious and easily recognizable features of it, necessarily induce them to stereotyping. In general, the briefer the time span of their sojourn in the new environment, the stronger the tendency to stereotype becomes. Hence, this tendency is common among the most fleeting type of strangers, the tourists, and particularly among organized mass tourists. One can frequently see busloads of tourists brought to touristic sights, all of them taking pictures of the same objects, be it a landscape, a building, or a local person, often under the guidance of a tourist guide. Among more individualized, nonconventional tourists, the choice of subjects is more differentiated and discerning, and the aspiration to catch the “authentic” more pronounced. Thus, participants in jungle trekking tours in Thailand, going beyond the boundaries of conventional tourism, usually disperse in the hill tribe villages in which their party stayed, each roaming the village to take individualized pictures. They eagerly “hunt” for objects, situations, and scenes that appear to them to be “authentic,” in the sense that they are part of the flow of “primitive” life, undisturbed and uninfluenced by the presence of strangers. Still, their brief stays in the village necessarily restrict their photos to a few daily scenes.”
–Erik Cohen, “Stranger-Local Interaction in Photography,” Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 19 No. 2 (1992)

Posted by | Comments (2) 
Category: Travel Quote of the Day

Leave a Reply

Main

Bio

Books

Stories

Essays

Video

Interviews

Events

Writers

Marco

Paris

Vagabonding.net

Contact

Marco Polo Didnt Go There
Rolf's new book!


Vagabonding
   Vagabonding


RECENT COMMENTS

magento站群: unquestionably such as your web-site and you have to take a look at the...

Briane Pagel: I just headed over here from an article on Rishikesh on Longform.org....

RK: Hi Colleen, Hope you had a great hitch! I agree that anyone hitching should be...

2 Digital Nomads: Very touchy, thanks for sharing. I will tweet and post on FB too.

DEK: Very young children are wholly absorbed in their mother and oblivious to whether...

Andy Pac: I lived in China for a year and loved it. The people were friendly, kind,...

Turner: Under three years old? Then yes, absolutely. A waste of time and money.

bicyclegourmet: i wonder if some ancient asian sage offered advice about buying a live...

Jennifer Miller: Rubin: Agreed.

Sage: Java is a wonderful place and I loved the trains in Indonesia!

SPONSORED BY :



CATEGORIES

TRAVEL LINKS

ARCHIVES

RECENT ENTRIES

Ellis Emmett: The nine most important things in life
Without travel, there would be no “us”
Charity school project in Bodhgaya, India
Vagabonding Field Report: Java, Indonesia
Vagabonding Field Report: Korea’s Demilitarized Zone (DMZ)
Is travel wasted on the very young?
Don’t fear failure
Pilgrims of yore had much in common with present-day tourists
Book review: Tearing up the Silk Road
3 Ways to invest in local economies


Subscribe to this blog's feed